翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ InterSwitch Trunk
・ Intersymbol interference
・ Intersystem crossing
・ InterSystems
・ InterSystems Caché
・ InterTAN
・ Intertarsal articulations
・ Intertec Superbrain
・ Intertec Systems
・ Intertech
・ Intertek
・ Intertek Consumer Goods and Retail
・ Intertel
・ Intertemporal budget constraint
・ Intertemporal CAPM
Intertemporal choice
・ Intertemporal consumption
・ Intertemporal equilibrium
・ Intertemporal law
・ Intertemporal portfolio choice
・ Intertestamental period
・ Intertex
・ Intertextuality
・ Interthalamic adhesion
・ Intertheoretic reduction
・ Intertidal ecology
・ Intertidal spider
・ Intertidal wetland
・ Intertidal zone
・ Intertitle


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Intertemporal choice : ウィキペディア英語版
Intertemporal choice
Intertemporal choice is the study of how people make choices about what and how much to do at various points in time, when choices at one time influence the possibilities available at other points in time. These choices are influenced by the relative value people assign to two or more payoffs at different points in time. Most choices require decision-makers to trade off costs and benefits at different points in time. These decisions may be about savings, work effort, education, nutrition, exercise, health care and so forth. Since early in the twentieth century, economists have analyzed intertemporal decisions using the discounted utility model, which assumes that people evaluate the pleasures and pains resulting from a decision in much the same way that financial markets evaluate losses and gains, exponentially ‘discounting’ the value of outcomes according to how delayed they are in time. Discounted utility has been used to describe how people actually make intertemporal choices and it has been used as a tool for public policy. Policy decisions about how much to spend on research and development, health and education all depend on the discount rate used to analyze the decision.
The Keynesian consumption function was based on two major hypotheses. Firstly, marginal propensity to consume lies between 0 and 1. Secondly, average propensity to consume falls as income rises. Early empirical studies were consistent with these hypotheses. However, after World War II it was observed that savings did not rise as incomes rose. The Keynesian model therefore failed to explain the consumption phenomenon and thus emerged the theory of intertemporal choice. Intertemporal choice was introduced by John Rae in 1834 in the "Sociological Theory of Capital". Later, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk in 1889 and Irving Fisher in 1930 elaborated on the model. A few other models based on intertemporal choice include the Life Cycle Income Hypothesis proposed by Modigiliani and the Permanent Income Hypothesis proposed by Milton Friedman. The concept of Walrasian Equilibrium may also be extended to incorporate intertemporal choice. The Walrasian analysis of such an equilibrium introduces two "new" concepts of prices: futures prices and spot prices.
==Fisher's Model of Intertemporal Consumption==

Irving Fisher developed the theory of intertemporal choice in his book ''Theory of interest'' (1930). Contrary to Keynes, who related consumption to current income, Fisher’s model showed how rational forward looking consumers choose consumption for the present and future to maximize their lifetime satisfaction.
According to Fisher, an individual's impatience depends on four characteristics of his income stream: the size, the time shape, the composition and risk. Besides this, foresight, self-control, habit, expectation of life, and bequest motive (or concern for lives of others) are the five personal factors that determine a person's impatience which in turn determines his time preference.
In order to understand the choice exercised by a consumer across different periods of time we take consumption in one period as a composite commodity. Suppose there is one consumer, N commodities, and two periods. Preferences are given by U(x_1, x_2) where x_t = (x_,\dots,x_). Income in period t is Y_t. Savings in period 1 is S_1, spending in period t is C_t, and r is the interest rate. If the person is unable to borrow against future income in the first period, then he is subject to separate budget constraints in each period:

C_1 + S_1 \le Y_1,    (1)
C_2 \le Y_2 + S_1(1 + r).     (2)
On the other hand, if such borrowing is possible then the person is subject to a single intertemporal budget constraint:
C_1 + \frac = Y_1 + \frac.     (3)
The left hand side shows the present value of expenditure and right hand side depicts the present value of income. Multiplying the equation by (1+r) would give us the corresponding future values.
Now the consumer has to choose a C_1 and C_2 so as to
:Maximize
::U(C_1,C_2)
:subject to
::C_1+C_2/(1+r) = Y_1 + Y_2/(1+r).
A consumer may be a net saver or a net borrower. If he's initially at a level of consumption where he's neither a net borrower nor a net saver, an increase in income may make him a net saver or a net borrower depending on his preferences. An increase in current income or future income will increase current and future consumption(consumption smoothing motives).
Now, let us consider a scenario where the interest rates are increased. If the consumer is a net saver, he will save more in the current period due to the substitution effect and consume more in the current period due to the income effect. The net effect thus becomes ambiguous. If the consumer is a net borrower, however, he will tend to consume less in the current period due to the substitution effect and income effect thereby reducing his overall current consumption.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Intertemporal choice」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.